CAC could start its own slabbing service to compete with PCGS and NGC. They already have builtin brand recognition and are more trusted than their two would-be competitors, as proven by APR's. They could note "A", "B", or "C" next to each grade, which would thus enable them to compete more effectively as they would not just slab the A and B coins that they already approve in PCGS and NGC slabs, but also C (average) coins, which represent a much higher percentage of all coins certified.
At CAC's verification site, they could include applicable modifiers not already on TPG inserts, such as FH, FB, and PL. This would be especially helpful for coins certified when such modifiers were not being anointed by the TPG's. Also, list CAC's actual grades for gold-beaned coins. And say "A" or "B" next to each grade, whether gold or green sticker.
Correctly graded but rejected coins could be listed as such at CAC's serial number verification website, which would open a whole new market for this vast supply of bean-bare but decent coins.
CAC could start a trading platform whereon screened collectors and dealers could buy and sell their CAC wares, no matter how paltry.
CAC itself should start listing coins on Ebay, the world's largest CAC marketplace. The Ebay fee is merely 8.5% for coins priced up to $4,000 and 2.5% for amounts above that, a very reasonable structure for pricier coins. Why should CAC give away coins to other dealers to make windfalls that CAC itself could be earning? The CAC sticker is CAC's invention, so what would be wrong with CAC reaping the profits?
CAC could start its own auction company, modeled somewhat after GC's due to the minimal work involved.
CAC could start its own Registry Set competitions. There will be NO modern coins to corrupt it as has happened to PCGS/NGC RS's and their scoring systems rigged to favor extremely plentiful modern coins (and thus encourage their highly profitable submissions).
CAC could have an online suggestion box. And solicit feedback from submitters. In other words, let others give you free marketing ideas. Maybe there is another David Hall out there but one who will work for free?
CAC could start a resolution board to quickly settle disputes between members without enduring the drawn out ANA or PNG procedures.
CAC could give annual and lifetime CAC dealer awards to giants who have helped promote CAC and its philosophies, like Laura Sperber, Ian Russell, and even JA himself.
INSERT OTHER SUGGESTIONS BELOW (and savage attacks against my suggestions that dare to think outside the subculture box).
Comments
"Those who limit themselves to the status quo become the embodiment of the status quo."
Then I can be rich!!! LOL.
CAC is aa lean company. I don't think solving disputes is something they have the manpower for.
- Ian
Defies logic.
But in my humble opinion, CAC is not exploiting its brand as well as it could. For instance, they could charge, say, a $300 fee for their resolution service. And there are ways to model their auction firm so as not to directly compete with friends.
“Hi Rae,
You’re so very fortunate that your job requires only minimal work.”
😉
Search "PCGS coins" at walmart.com.
Doers versus talkers. Trump vs. Obama (no political commentary intended, just stating a fact).
And, how can anyone start a new auction company and not "step" on the toes of all the rest? Wouldn't there be a new company competing for coins from the same pool of potential sales?
Thinking "outside the box" is a good thing for any business. Realizing when "acting outside the box" will not produce the desired results is an act of intelligence.
"Ian owns the world's third largest coin auction firm (in dollar volume). He built it up himself using his outside-the-box ideas. "
Not to take anything away from Ian's monumental accomplishments... but the core business model for GC was the brainchild if Bernard Rome and Julie Abrams.
Granted when Ian joined up with them it was a huge boon for Teletrade.