1) black NGC 1.0 holders
2) white label NGC 2.1 holders
3) White label NGC 2.0 holders
3) white label PCGS rattler 1.0 and 1.1 holders
4) Regency PCGS holders
5) Doily PCGS holders
6) Rare PCGS and NGC sample slabs
7) ALL gold stickered PCGS holders.
8) Even PCGS OGH holders if they do not cross to plus graded CAC 1.0 holders.
9) PCGS OGH holders of red copper coins to show its long term stability from toning.
That leaves lots of coins to submit to CAC grading.
I am sure that even JA would agree with most of my suggested list.
I highly suggest that raw coins get submitted to CAC Grading first to avoid the triple fees of PCGS/NGC then CAC stickering then crossing to CAC 1.0.
Comments
re-holdered on a case by case coin analysis.
I agree, as long as you don’t mind that coin no longer being eligible for the PCGS Registry.
Steve
Even generic P rattlers are worth $100+ just for the plastic? I actually had several (maybe 6?) consecutively numbered doily P coins that I sent in back then. Never thought about them ever being worth anything extra. I just remember thinking I didn’t like the label. 🤷♂️
A PCGS-CAC non-Plus would likely be more valuable than an NGC-CAC Plus. But a full grade upgrade would be worth trying. You can always get the CAC sticker back if the upgrade attempt fails, assuming that you have photos of the original certification.